In view of my comments in my previous blog, this is an interesting article. Danish judges in a prestigious competition have rejected a photographer's images as being over processed from RAW. The images were changed dramatically from the original versions. The judges have raised an interesting debate about RAW processing, especially regarding photo-journalistic images.
Read the article here and see the images for yourself.
Cheers,
Paul
www.indigo2photography.co.uk
Follow me on twitter
Read the article here and see the images for yourself.
Cheers,
Paul
www.indigo2photography.co.uk
Follow me on twitter
Comments
It is naive to think that the phrase "the camera never lies" has ever been 100% accurate. Photographers have burned and doged while printing from film since the beginning of photography.
I guess it comes down to the rules and the spirit of the competition... what is the purpose of the competition? Is it art? Is it a record of the technical ability of the camera carried by the photographer at that point in time?