Skip to main content

Over use of image processing from RAW

In view of my comments in my previous blog, this is an interesting article. Danish judges in a prestigious competition have rejected a photographer's images as being over processed from RAW. The images were changed dramatically from the original versions. The judges have raised an interesting debate about RAW processing, especially regarding photo-journalistic images.

Read the article here and see the images for yourself.

Cheers,

Paul
www.indigo2photography.co.uk
Follow me on twitter

Comments

Anonymous said…
I don't see anything wrong with the post processing of those images. They have not heavy edited in sense of new objects coming to the photo, and change of clouds and stuff. It's just playing with the contrast and the lighting.
Rudy said…
For me it depends what the objective of the photo or story is. If the objective is to document and inform on the reality, the photo's should be realistic. If the objective is to create glamour, the photo should be glamour. If the objective is to be creative, i think you can do anything you like in post processing. But you should clearly identify it as a creative work of art using a photo as starting point. In this case the results are more creative expressions ; in my opinion they are not suited for documentary purposes. I disagree with M. G. it is not just playing with contrast and lighting - this is much more.
Iain Jeffrey said…
And so the debate continues... How would the judges have considered a B & W conversion? Isn't that a significant change from the RAW original? A simple grayscale conversion would probably have resulted in a flat and lifeless image. Some manipulation of the contrast would be required, maybe extracting some detail from the shadows or recovering details from the highlights... is that going too far.

It is naive to think that the phrase "the camera never lies" has ever been 100% accurate. Photographers have burned and doged while printing from film since the beginning of photography.

I guess it comes down to the rules and the spirit of the competition... what is the purpose of the competition? Is it art? Is it a record of the technical ability of the camera carried by the photographer at that point in time?

Popular posts from this blog

The portrait photographer's motivation

Easy access to the Internet and digital photography has resulted in an ever growing number of photographers uploading their images for comments and ratings from peers. Online communities evolve and these mini-societies each have their pecking order, internal groups and communal preferences. Photographers learn from each other. On sites that have a rating system there is often pressure to conform to certain styles, techniques and even subject matter. Although I participate in numerous sites (it's great fun), I recognise the danger of becoming a herd animal and losing the edge of individual creativity. There will always be the creatives that lead the way and the imitators that can only try to follow in their footsteps. This lead me to think about classifying photographers according their inner motivation. So as a bit of fun here are a few different types: The innovator Driven to always find something new, different and creative. Wants to be leading edge. Motivated by creative satisfa...

Beyond the Obvious: Lessons from the Masters of Photography

  In photography, there’s more than technical skill or gear; the real art is in connection, storytelling, and moments that matter. In this blog, I’ll explore what I have learned by taking master classes with photographers like Steve McCurry, Joel Meyerowitz, and Albert Watson. One of the surprising outcomes of learning from them was discovering just how closely my  thoughts and practice aligned with theirs although I've always carved my own path. There is something delightful about finding kindred spirits. I wanted to share what I've learnt and remind us of our true practice as photographers behind the lens. Storytelling Through Human Connection A photograph should convey more than just skill—it should capture a story that resonates. Steve McCurry’s iconic Afghan Girl does this beautifully, capturing strength and vulnerability in a single frame. Like McCurry, I believe photography should reveal the depth and uniqueness of our subjects. This requires empathy, patience, and a ...

Why do you take photographs?

Have you ever asked yourself why you photograph? It's a question that can be answered with a simple one-sentence answer until you start delving deeper. The answer then becomes increasingly complex and challenging to unravel. I've again undertaken this journey recently, and my answer is below. Portrait of Paul Indigo by Magda Indigo. Thanks Magda! I also reviewed my images over the last ten-plus years, selected 30 of my favourite photos, and compiled them into a slide show. This was a challenging task. My favourites change by the day, probably by the minute. Still, eventually, I got to a selection I titled "That's Life." Please click through to YouTube to view the full screen. My approach to people and landscape photography is characterised by a distinctive blend of documentary and fine art techniques. I aim to create images that are both deeply personal and universally relatable. Through portraiture, I strive to showcase the broad spectrum of human experience. I a...