Skip to main content

Advice for street photographers


This gentleman agreed to pose for me. He wanted to know whether my camera was digital or film. He said he would pose if it was digital but not if it was film. I am not sure exactly what his reasons were.

He was patient and followed my directions on where to stand. Several photographers have asked me how I get people to pose for me. Rather than repeating myself I'd like to refer you to an article I wrote back in May 2005.

I hope it helps you and as always your comments are gratefully received.

Cheers,
Paul
www.indigo2photography.co.uk

Comments

Anonymous said…
NIce article. Talking with potential models is a most important.
Anonymous said…
I affraid it's not street photography but typical portrait photography.
Hi Alex, thanks for stopping by and commenting. I'm not sure I agree with you though. It depends on your definition of street photography. I had a look at your blog which is excellent.

How do you define street photography? Two of the listed masters of street photography on your blog, HCB and William Klein both took many pictures of people posing for them on the street.

Cheers,
Paul
Mark M. Hancock said…
Although I'm not certain, I believe film is taboo because it's a "graven image" while digital is not. It'll be graven if it's ever published on a press, but that's not an immediate problem.
Thanks Mark.
Anonymous said…
You right Paul - define a term street photography is the first thing should be done. Well... I believe that this real streetphoto is based on a simple idea to keep the subjects from being aware that they are being photographed. Why? Street photography tends to be ironic, shows a pure vision of something and mainly capture this decisive moment.

If I ask someone to pose for me, or this person noticed that I try to use my camera and have enough time to pose - than it's more like portrait photography, or in some way documentary photography.

I would say that street photography is like sophisticated form of candid photography with special message from photographer :-)
An interesting debate Alex. I understand where you are coming from.

Where would you place William Klein's iconic image of the boy with the revolver pointing straight at the lens. William asked the boy to look defiant. And what about HCB's picture of the boy carrying the wine bottle, which was also posed. I won't even attempt to list all the examples of street photography where the subject is clearly aware of the photographer.

I think street photography is hard to define but my definition would be photographs taken on the street which are not specially set up and planned beforehand, but are spontaneous moments, where the subject can be aware or unaware of the photographer.

Street photography is about free expression, the photographer interacting with his environment. I think your definition is just a little too narrow for me.

All the best,

Paul

Popular posts from this blog

Approach to taking a portrait

Portrait of Amitabh Bachchan. Click on the image to see larger version. Every portrait is different but there are also elements which are the same, whether you’re shooting the famous or the locally famous. Fame is of course all relative. It depends on profession, accomplishments or media celebrity status. Whoever the ‘famous’ individual is there are millions of people in the world who will never have heard them. For example I photographed the legendary Indian Bollywood actor Amitabh Bachchan, who amongst his many accolades was awarded the Legion d'Honneur, the highest civilian award of France. But I’m positive that many people in North America will not have heard of him – although he has more fans than Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson and Robert De Niro put together. I find that however well known a person is cracking through egos and insecurities is really important when it comes to getting authentic strong portraits. However I hasten to add that when it came to photographing Amitabh th

The portrait photographer's motivation

Easy access to the Internet and digital photography has resulted in an ever growing number of photographers uploading their images for comments and ratings from peers. Online communities evolve and these mini-societies each have their pecking order, internal groups and communal preferences. Photographers learn from each other. On sites that have a rating system there is often pressure to conform to certain styles, techniques and even subject matter. Although I participate in numerous sites (it's great fun), I recognise the danger of becoming a herd animal and losing the edge of individual creativity. There will always be the creatives that lead the way and the imitators that can only try to follow in their footsteps. This lead me to think about classifying photographers according their inner motivation. So as a bit of fun here are a few different types: The innovator Driven to always find something new, different and creative. Wants to be leading edge. Motivated by creative satisfa

Don't use your camera on manual settings

Antwerp successfully preserves a sense of tradition and history, here with the horse drawn carriage and the famous Cathedral in the background, making it attractive to tourists, while at the same time boasting some beautiful modern architecture. The picture above was a split second grab shot. As usual my Canon EOS 5D was set to AV (aperture priority) and I trusted my light meter to give me the correct exposure. As it happened the background sky was extremely bright and the foreground in deep shadow, so the background was a bit overexposed. Using the RAW file's information I was able to retrieve detail everywhere important. Read any guide to improving your photography, listen to photographers advice and you'll be told to set your camera to manual. Using program mode is strictly for amateurs we're told. Well I beg to differ and respected photography tutor John Wade shares my viewpoint. Camera design these days has advanced tremendously and automatic metering has become relia