Skip to main content

Giving your images a feeling of quality























What's the number one ingredient that gives an image a sense of quality? It's something that's free and readily available. Hmm so not that new state-art-digital camera then... nope. Well it's got to be the lens then. Nope. "Free", oh I see, well it'll be the composition, depth of field and colour then.

Well no it is none of the above. I am sure you must have guessed already that I am talking about light. Photography is after all drawing with light. It pains me to see so many photographers spending a fortune on new equipment in the pursuit of clear, sharp images that exude a feeling of quality only to get knocked back with disapointing results.

If you have an understanding of light you can use a toy camera with a plastic lens and achieve a feeling of visual quality. Put that same knowledge together with a great camera system and you're on your way to quality Nirvana.

There are many excellent books and articles on the net about lighting so I'm not going to give a lesson here. All I want to do is say that in my view the most important factor in determining image quality is the lighting. Of course it's not the only factor.

It is however the most exciting to work with as the variables are almost infinite. Light is affected by the time of year, the atmospheric conditions, the time of day, reflections etc. Man made light also comes in a tremendous variety. I have a friend who used to do a lot of evening shots and he loved using car headlights, claimed no other light source gave him that exact quality.

In the studio using a softbox, a translucent white umbrella, a silver reflective umbrella, a beauty light ... all give vastly different results. The only way to really learn about light is by using your eyes to look at how different light sources behave and by examing your images. And don't think you have to invest in very expensive studio lights to get a good result. A cheap off camera flash with a translucent white umbrella can provide an excellent diffused light source, ideal for portraits. As always it pays to be creative and think outside the well worn paths that 'experts' and marketers try to drive everyone along.

The image of Ivan above was shot with a soft box, partly covered with black cloth to reduce the size of the light source (I didn't have a small softbox handy so improvised) and a backlight with a honeycomb. This image and others can be viewed in my online portrait exhibition on www.indigo2photography.co.uk

I am happy to respond to any questions you may have. Just email me.

Ciao,

Paul

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Obvious: Lessons from the Masters of Photography

  In photography, there’s more than technical skill or gear; the real art is in connection, storytelling, and moments that matter. In this blog, I’ll explore what I have learned by taking master classes with photographers like Steve McCurry, Joel Meyerowitz, and Albert Watson. One of the surprising outcomes of learning from them was discovering just how closely my  thoughts and practice aligned with theirs although I've always carved my own path. There is something delightful about finding kindred spirits. I wanted to share what I've learnt and remind us of our true practice as photographers behind the lens. Storytelling Through Human Connection A photograph should convey more than just skill—it should capture a story that resonates. Steve McCurry’s iconic Afghan Girl does this beautifully, capturing strength and vulnerability in a single frame. Like McCurry, I believe photography should reveal the depth and uniqueness of our subjects. This requires empathy, patience, and a ...

The portrait photographer's motivation

Easy access to the Internet and digital photography has resulted in an ever growing number of photographers uploading their images for comments and ratings from peers. Online communities evolve and these mini-societies each have their pecking order, internal groups and communal preferences. Photographers learn from each other. On sites that have a rating system there is often pressure to conform to certain styles, techniques and even subject matter. Although I participate in numerous sites (it's great fun), I recognise the danger of becoming a herd animal and losing the edge of individual creativity. There will always be the creatives that lead the way and the imitators that can only try to follow in their footsteps. This lead me to think about classifying photographers according their inner motivation. So as a bit of fun here are a few different types: The innovator Driven to always find something new, different and creative. Wants to be leading edge. Motivated by creative satisfa...

Why do you take photographs?

Have you ever asked yourself why you photograph? It's a question that can be answered with a simple one-sentence answer until you start delving deeper. The answer then becomes increasingly complex and challenging to unravel. I've again undertaken this journey recently, and my answer is below. Portrait of Paul Indigo by Magda Indigo. Thanks Magda! I also reviewed my images over the last ten-plus years, selected 30 of my favourite photos, and compiled them into a slide show. This was a challenging task. My favourites change by the day, probably by the minute. Still, eventually, I got to a selection I titled "That's Life." Please click through to YouTube to view the full screen. My approach to people and landscape photography is characterised by a distinctive blend of documentary and fine art techniques. I aim to create images that are both deeply personal and universally relatable. Through portraiture, I strive to showcase the broad spectrum of human experience. I a...