Skip to main content

Do you speak light?

The prow of a fishing boat is caught in evening sunlight, as dark storm clouds approach. Note the warmth of the low sunlight, the contrast against the sky, the texture of the hull and the interesting shadows on the mast. This is a straight shot from the camera, without any enhancement in image manipulation software.

Light is the language of photography. To express yourself well and communicate you need to be able to speak with light.

Light determines what you see (and what you don’t see); the mood of an image; colour and tone. Light can be loud and brash or soft, gentle and soothing. It can wrap around something or cut across it as hard and sharp as a Samurai sword.

People have probably been writing about the qualities of light and how to use it in relation to photography from the moment the first print was made. Google “light in photography” and you will get millions of hits (well actually 68,800,000 hits to be entirely accurate).

In the past I’ve been complimented for explaining things clearly in plain language. So here goes on the subject of light…

Things to consider about lighting when you are about to make a photograph:

  • What do I want to communicate about my subject? Consider, personality, mood, clarity, what you want to emphasise?
  • What do you want to show and what do you want to hide?
  • Pick your view point with the light in mind. Can you control the light within your frame? Can you make it say what you want it to say about your subject?
  • How can you improve the light? By adding flash, using constant light sources, bouncing light, using reflectors, covering windows with a translucent material, using black cloth to absorb light, using Gobos and flags between the light source and subject, using gels, waiting for a different time of day etc

Here’s some layman’s science to help you understand light

The size of the light source and its distance to the subject affect how hard or soft it is and how deep the shadows will be. A larger light source like a softbox, large window, umbrella flash or bounced flash will produce a softer light. The smaller the light source the harder the light and stronger the shadows. Diffusion simply comes down to making a light source bigger in relation to the subject.

Light always hits your subject at an angle, whether it is straight from the front, at 90 degrees, behind, top, bottom or from many angles simultaneously. The angle of the light dramatically affects the look of the subject.

Light has colour, specifically it has a colour temperature, which means it can be warm, cool or neutral. The colour we see depends on the wavelength of the light reflected off the object we are looking at. Colour deeply affects our emotions. Warm colours seem to come forward while cold colours recede. Using colour of light in this way is a classic way to create a sense of depth and visual tension in an image.

The quality of the light will be affected by its intensity. For example the same flash reflected off a silver umbrella has a harsher quality than if it were reflected off a white umbrella surface.

So if you want to speak the language of light here’s a quick checklist you should run in your head:

  1. How intense does the light need to be?
  2. What is the best angle for the light?
  3. What colour/s do I want?
  4. What size light source?
  5. What can I do to control and enhance the light?

Just remember every element above needs to contribute to the emotion you are aiming to communicate. Think of light as the language you are using to describe your subject; quite literally to show the viewer what you want them to see – nothing more and nothing less.

Controlling light and getting it do what you want it to is a technical art. It is not easy. But with perseverance, determination, close observation and loads of experience you will begin to master it. After all my years as a photographer I am still learning the language of light every day and this journey will continue until I shoot my last frame.

As ever, I hope you find my blog helpful and your comments are always welcome.

Cheers,

Paul
www.indigo2photography.co.uk
Follow me on twitter

Comments

Mike the B said…
Excellent points all. I just finished a round of birthdays, book signings and city festivals. All of them touched on your points. After reviewing them and reading your blog, I still have much to learn and remember. Thanks for the points.
Wesley Danes said…
Nice article.
I can recommend everybody to read about the rules of reflection and refraction. I found some of the basics here:
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/refln/
and here:
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/refrn/

and this is just about the direction of light. While as a photographer you ofcourse have to deal with all the aspects of light you mention in your article as well.
thank you for this post.
Steve said…
Just a thought - The RAF School of Photography had as its motto - "We write with light". Very apt.
kombizz said…
For sure you mention an essentional point in photo capturing.
I wonder if the novice digital camera user know about this rule or the rule of PS!
Bill Gatesman said…
Dear Paul,

Thank you for sharing these important thoughts on light. It is apparent from your work that you have a good relationship with that fickle spirit, light.

I have written an blog post on the fickle nature of natural light and its impact on photography at:

http://wmgphotoblog.com/2008/07/03/natural-light-is-an-elusive-subject/

Keep up the good work, and again, thank you for sharing your observations on this important topic.

Bill Gatesman
www.wmgphoto.com
www.wmgphotoblog.com
mmaxutov said…
Hello Paul,

Very interesting article.
Thanks for sharing!
Vijay said…
Very informative writings and I learned many facts from your blogs! I got into photography as a mean capture the key moments I come across and the beauties of nature, and it has become my prime leisure activity. Little by little I am improving my skills thanks to the people sharing info on the net.
Cheers!
Vijay

Popular posts from this blog

Approach to taking a portrait

Portrait of Amitabh Bachchan. Click on the image to see larger version. Every portrait is different but there are also elements which are the same, whether you’re shooting the famous or the locally famous. Fame is of course all relative. It depends on profession, accomplishments or media celebrity status. Whoever the ‘famous’ individual is there are millions of people in the world who will never have heard them. For example I photographed the legendary Indian Bollywood actor Amitabh Bachchan, who amongst his many accolades was awarded the Legion d'Honneur, the highest civilian award of France. But I’m positive that many people in North America will not have heard of him – although he has more fans than Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson and Robert De Niro put together. I find that however well known a person is cracking through egos and insecurities is really important when it comes to getting authentic strong portraits. However I hasten to add that when it came to photographing Amitabh th

The portrait photographer's motivation

Easy access to the Internet and digital photography has resulted in an ever growing number of photographers uploading their images for comments and ratings from peers. Online communities evolve and these mini-societies each have their pecking order, internal groups and communal preferences. Photographers learn from each other. On sites that have a rating system there is often pressure to conform to certain styles, techniques and even subject matter. Although I participate in numerous sites (it's great fun), I recognise the danger of becoming a herd animal and losing the edge of individual creativity. There will always be the creatives that lead the way and the imitators that can only try to follow in their footsteps. This lead me to think about classifying photographers according their inner motivation. So as a bit of fun here are a few different types: The innovator Driven to always find something new, different and creative. Wants to be leading edge. Motivated by creative satisfa

Is professional photography still a viable career?

I am not against amateurs and semi-professionals selling their photography. It's a great way to earn some extra cash. However I am concerned about the level of high quality published work and the standards that clients and the public accept these days. It seems that just about everyone is a photographer. The line between amateur enthusiast and professional is fuzzy to say the least. Photography enthusiasts are selling their images through stock libraries and microstock websites, directly to magazines or through their own and third party sites. They're accepting commissions to shoot weddings, being hired to shoot for magazines and selling fine art prints from their websites. They're teaching photography on the weekend and guiding photographic holidays and safaris. Photography became accessible to the masses with the first non-expert cameras and the famous Kodak slogan"You press the button, we do the rest." The digital camera age has taken the whole thing to a ne