Skip to main content

Why use a professional photographer instead of stock images

Waiting for something to happen. People on a bench in Ostend, Belgium.

Why should you use a professional photographer instead of downloading an image from a stock library? Well there are many good reasons and I hope that photographers reading my blog find something useful here when pitching for new work and marketing themselves.

I've got nothing against stock libraries as such and in fact I contribute to a few. These days though the returns are diminishing and articles keep appearing challenging the viability of making a living as a traditional stock photographer. Enthusiasts and amateurs have swamped the stock library market with images and unfortunately designers and agencies, with pressure increasing on their budgets, all too quickly turn to stock libraries for their picture needs.

So it is becoming more important than ever for good professional photographers to differentiate themselves from the offerings of stock libraries.

Here goes...

When a company hires a pro photographer they get far more than an image file. They get the benefit of the photographer's experience, creativity, knowledge and insight. Essentially a company is not just paying for an image they are paying for that particular photographer's skill and ability.

With the current economic situation business is more competitive than ever before and a lot of companies are selling similar things. How can they make themselves stand out? The only way is to push their brand, to have something unique and instantly recognisable in the market place. So a style of imagery which is in line with the company's brand needs to be developed and kept consistent.

A company cannot differentiate itself by downloading a hotch potch of images from a stock library and trying to shoe horn them into their corporate brand. These images may well be gracing the adverts and brochures of their competitors too. The only way to get a truly unique image is to commission it or pay a stock library for exclusive rights, which would probably turn out more expensive than hiring a photographer in the first place.

A good professional photographer will take a brief and analyze the requirement in the context of what the client wants to achieve. The photographer will develop an understanding of the brand and how the company wants to portray itself, what makes it unique.

When it comes to the actual day of the photo shoot the ability to make last minute changes and explore spur of the moment creative opportunities can be invaluable. The client will also have excellent control over the quality of the final image. The client's creative team working together with the photographer means more brain power, skill and experience are brought to bare on solving the core issue of how to sell the product and market the company effectively through visual media.

Littering a company's website, brochure and sales leaflets with 1$ stock library images can cost that company a lot more than using a professional photographer because of the damage it can do to the brand, corporate identity and the image of the company. And when you think of the costs of designing, printing and delivering a marketing campaign then the cost of hiring a photographer is fairly small in the overall budget.

Hiring a good professional photographer is the only solution for a company that wants exclusive photographic imagery that sets it apart from competitors.

Unfortunately individual photographers are up against huge corporate stock library marketing machines when it comes to persuading agencies, designers and companies to make the right choice. But if we speak with one voice and consistently push the benefits forward of using a professional photographer we can hopefully start to redress the balance.

Comments and feedback welcome.

Paul Indigo
www.indigo2photography.co.uk

Comments

Anonymous said…
its so true!!
my dad is a pro photographer and he's been having this problem for years!
since digital photography became mainstream and readily available to anybody....photographers have suffered!!
more people need to read this.
Unknown said…
We face a similar dilemma with a site we run which is design for guest at wedding to upload and share pictures they take, many pro photographers feel threatened by this. It is a fact you are getting more and more people with better quality DSLR and compact digital cameras, even with access to photo editors like elements and Photoshop. A true pro photographer brings so much more to the picture than just the finished image on paper.

Compare weddings where there has been no pro photographer with ones where you have had a great pro photographer, there is no comparison. The set pieces are crap or missing all together, the bride and groom don’t look relaxed or at their best.

We encourage pro's to endorse the new technologies and use them to their advantage, if you do not believe you can do a better job than even a keen amateur, maybe you are in the wrong game.

Regards
Adrian
http://www.disposableweddingcamera.net
http://www.weddingphotoshot.com
Anonymous said…
Classic.
Digital photography has changed photography forever for both the good and the bad. It is just sad that professionals are suffereing.
Saxby said…
As the world changes, people find new jobs and lose old ones as supply & demand shifts. You need to adapt to the change in order to continue to be successful. This is easier said than done for most though. I wish all photographers the best with their careers!
Kelly Weppler- Hernandez, my marketing coach, sent me the link to 5 Small Biz Web Design Trends, which linked your article. I am struggling with getting people to understand the difference between a professional photographer and someone who has a Canon Rebel and thinks they can shoot a good picture. I will be reprinting or linking back to your article... so others can read it. You have inspired me... Thank you! My New Website is coming soon. Linda Joseph, Silver Moon Photography
Thanks Linda and everyone that has taken the time to comment here.

Your feedback makes writing my blog worthwhile.

The other reason to write is of course to get something off my mind.

I really want to help fellow photographers succeed. We have a huge job to do, educating clients about the value of hiring a professional photographer.
Lisa Saad said…
Very interesting, good job and thanks for sharing such a good blog.
Lisa Saad Photographer

Popular posts from this blog

Is professional photography still a viable career?

I am not against amateurs and semi-professionals selling their photography. It's a great way to earn some extra cash. However I am concerned about the level of high quality published work and the standards that clients and the public accept these days. It seems that just about everyone is a photographer. The line between amateur enthusiast and professional is fuzzy to say the least. Photography enthusiasts are selling their images through stock libraries and microstock websites, directly to magazines or through their own and third party sites. They're accepting commissions to shoot weddings, being hired to shoot for magazines and selling fine art prints from their websites. They're teaching photography on the weekend and guiding photographic holidays and safaris. Photography became accessible to the masses with the first non-expert cameras and the famous Kodak slogan"You press the button, we do the rest." The digital camera age has taken the whole thing to a

All the different types of photography

Welcome to my blog. While you're here why not browse through my extensive library of articles covering everything from tips on how to do things photographic to help with the mental approach you need to become a successful photographer. You'll also find articles with some of my unconventional views. Yes, I've rattled a view cages in my time. Hope you have as much fun reading them as I did writing them. You can view my more serious work on www.indigo2photography.co.uk All the different types of photography With the help of acquaintances on a photographic site I've tried to compile a list of all the different types of photography out there. I'm sure there are many still missing but the list is pretty impressive so far. We have identified around 80 descriptions. For fun I've highlighted in bold the different types I've done so far... 3D photography Action photography Advertising photography Aerial photography Amateur photography Animal photography Ar

The art of writing a caption

A caption in its simplest form is the the title of an image but usually we mean a bit more. A full caption takes the form of descriptive text, usually a few sentences. A good caption informs us about the things we cannot see and encourages us to look at an image more closely. There is a relationship of mutual benefit and dependence between a well written caption and an image. The caption can bring an image to life by providing context and meaning. It is also the link between the article/story/text and the image. Magda Indigo has written a good description of a caption here . I agree with her dislike of "untitled". It does show a certain lack of imagination and is not particularly helpful to the viewer. Creating an image is all about trying to communicate something and the caption is vital to help the audience understand an image. It can hugely enhance the viewers experience. A good caption is a piece of writing that should be concise, accurate, informative and as carefully