Skip to main content

Technical knowledge is not that important

Everyone is telling you that you've got to learn the technical aspects of photography. Blogs, websites, books all hammer the message home and if you don't know your f-stops, the difference between a jpeg and raw file and how to use every tool in Photoshop, you're somehow inferior and can't possibly take a good picture.

I suppose in our technology obsessed world it's not surprising that the how you do something takes precedence over the why you do it.

Technique and the technical aspects of photography are vitally important. You have to have enough technical knowledge and craftsmanship to be able to create the image you envisage each and every time. As a photographer you have to have the skills and technical knowledge of a builder, or you house will fall down, but you also need the vision of an architect to create something beautiful and interesting.

Recently on two separate occasions I saw promising new professional photographers at work. They knew their technical stuff, had a good understanding of lighting and composition, were enthusiastic and motivated to deliver good images but as I watched them I realised something vital was missing. During the shoot both photographers appeared to lose focus on the most important thing of all, the reason they were taking the pictures.

These photographers were far to busy with the 'how' questions while taking their images instead of the 'why' questions. They broke the flow of their sessions by constantly chimping (looking at the screen of their digital cameras) instead of keeping their attention on their subjects. Every time they looked at their screens they went off into their own little universe and lost contact with their subjects. They worried about exposure, histograms, lighting ratios, camera settings etc. While they should have worried about whether their images would communicate with the audience.

A few professional photographers I know say how liberated they feel when they go out with a Lomo or Holga 'toy' camera. Just point and shoot. They enjoy taking the images. Neither camera has a sharp lens so you don't have to even worry about that aspect of technique. It becomes all about making an interesting image. The technical burden is lifted from their shoulders.

For me technical knowledge is far less important than communication. You have to know what you want to say and why you're taking a picture. The technique follows from this. In architecture the phrase is often used; 'form follows function'. In photography you could say, 'technique follows expression.'

Lets look at this from another perspective. If you think of the great masters of the craft of photography then Ansel Adams is bound to spring to mind. But why was Ansel so obsessed with the technical aspects of photography? He had to master the technical aspects so that he could to put the vision of the final image he had in his head on paper.

You will see the world in a completely different way to Ansel. You will have your own emotions and thoughts that you want to communicate. For your images to have real authenticity that touches the audience you only need to learn enough technique to be able to produce on paper or screen the vision you have in your head. Of course if you don't know enough then you will fail too.

So to summarise here are dos and don'ts that will help you become a better photographer:
  • Don't be seduced by the craft of photography
  • Don't learn photography theory that you don't need and won't use
  • Don't waste time trying to learn everything there is to know about Photoshop
  • Don't worry about technical stuff when you're taking pictures (it's too late)
  • Don't let technically obsessed people make you feel inferior because you don't have a clue what they're on about
  • Don't make the mistake of thinking that if you have enough technical knowledge you will somehow become a fantastic photographer. Why you take pictures is far more important.
  • Don't chimp constantly
  • Don't let craft and technique get in the way of you getting the shot
  • Don't fiddle with your camera and lights constantly when photographing people

  • Do think about why you are making the image and what you want to communicate
  • Do give your full attention to your subject
  • Do learn the technical knowledge that you need so you can realise your creative vision
  • Do become so familiar with your camera, lighting setup and other aspects that they become routine and automatic
  • Do focus your efforts on your creative vision rather than on learning the technical aspects of photography
Technique and technical knowledge are there to serve you, to help you express yourself. To use a metaphor. If you are making a speech you can have perfect diction and a pleasant voice but if what you are saying is boring, or doesn't make sense, your audience will soon lose interest. If you do not know why you are taking the picture and you don't feel it in your heart, then don't bother pushing the shutter button.

Comments welcome.

Cheers,
Paul
www.indigo2photography.co.uk

Comments

Simon said…
In my experience, the people who take consistently brilliant pictures nearly always know their stuff, but they also know how to focus their attention on the present moment.

I do know one brilliant pro photographer who doesn't know his arse from his elbow when it comes to technical knowledge though...
Tana said…
Yeah, when I do a shoot with my kids, it's usually spontaneous and in the moment. I'll take a few shots, they'll pay attention to the camera (what does Mommy have?) and then they go back to what they're doing while I make sure I have the right settings (based on the time of day, available light, etc.) and then we settle in to the shoot and I get some good ones. I agree with what you're saying - you have to learn what things to pay attention to (like focusing on the eyes) and then let the rest go once you get it in the neighborhood and just shoot away. That's when you get the good shots.

Tana
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pageta/
Anonymous said…
Paul,

I think a guy was trying to write about the very same thing in a comment on my blog here, but the way you wrote about it is just so convincing and sounds like an opinion from a real pro.
I'm just a hobbyist photographer eager to learn about photography, and yes, I'm a geek somewhat obsessed with technology.

Now, I will try to find 'my why', the reason why I'm pressing the shutter button and my emotions that I would like to communicate with my pictures.

Thank you for you article.

Best regards,
Tibor
Aaron said…
I agree that it's a bad idea to get mired in the technical aspects of the craft of photography, though photography is fundamentally a technical field (especially digital photography), so there is some amount of technical knowledge any photographer should have.

I think the best advice that could be given to a person who is insecure about their technical knowledge or abilities in photography would be "keep shooting." The wrong advice would be to lock yourself in a room and read nine Photoshop books and study the works of great masters without making a single image, although doing those things are not bad in and of themselves.

It is only through experience and vision that anyone can be satisfied with their work; when, as you said about Ansel Adams, you can finally put down on paper the vision that was in your mind, you understand quite enough.
Anonymous said…
Very well said.
I too am an avid amateur who sometimes gets lost in the technical aspects, but I do try to never lose focus on the subject of my shoots.
So much to learn, but remember to always have fun is my motto.
Anonymous said…
This is great advice! I've seen to many photographers lose their focus on the composition of the image. Sure, take a second to make sure that you are exposing properly, but after that, look at what you are actually photographing and make sure that it is interesting and compelling.
Firstly I want to say I am relatively new to the photography. I would like to say thank you as your blog is really motivating and I will be checking it out in great detail. Your articles are really interesting and useful and backed up with quality photos. Thought provoking stuff and great inspiration for me to improve my photography.

About the article: because I am new to all this, the technical side scares the pants of me at time as it is so involved. I strongly believe the most technically knowledge doesn’t guarantee great photos only the opportunity for great photos. You also need a passion to portray what you see to your viewer.
"or me technical knowledge is far less important than communication."

ALWAYS agree with you - the technical just helps us make sure we're communicating on purpose instead of by accident.
Iain said…
I think I can see elements of me in what you describe! I've just started using a DSLR after years of digital compacts and do feel some "pressure" to learn how to post process my pictures. Of course, the growing geek in me likes that idea, but I possibly need to remind myself once in a while that I should just get out and shoot.

Iain
www.thewestring.co.uk

(Found my way here from ADIDAP and am going to take a look around.)
Anonymous said…
Hi Paul,

It's me again. I must admit that I was very much influenced by your post when decided not to buy new pieces of equipment for a while and enrolled into a portrait photography course.
I'm writing about the details here.

Best regards,
Tibor

Popular posts from this blog

Approach to taking a portrait

Portrait of Amitabh Bachchan. Click on the image to see larger version. Every portrait is different but there are also elements which are the same, whether you’re shooting the famous or the locally famous. Fame is of course all relative. It depends on profession, accomplishments or media celebrity status. Whoever the ‘famous’ individual is there are millions of people in the world who will never have heard them. For example I photographed the legendary Indian Bollywood actor Amitabh Bachchan, who amongst his many accolades was awarded the Legion d'Honneur, the highest civilian award of France. But I’m positive that many people in North America will not have heard of him – although he has more fans than Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson and Robert De Niro put together. I find that however well known a person is cracking through egos and insecurities is really important when it comes to getting authentic strong portraits. However I hasten to add that when it came to photographing Amitabh th

Capturing the truth: The power of documentary photography to shape public opinion

Photographer, writer and artist, Paul Indigo (Photo by Magda Indigo ) Documentary photography is more important than ever because it plays a critical role in informing and shaping public opinion, particularly in today's fast-paced, information-saturated world. With the rise of social media and the 24-hour news cycle, we are bombarded with images and information daily. It can be difficult to separate fact from fiction. From a trusted source, documentary photography counterbalances the often sensationalised and biased coverage of social and political issues. Documentary photography can challenge dominant narratives and foster greater understanding and empathy by presenting a nuanced, humanistic perspective on complex issues. It can highlight underreported and marginalised issues, giving voice to those who are often ignored or silenced. In a world where many people feel disenfranchised and marginalised, documentary photography can help to create a sense of community and solidarity by

The portrait photographer's motivation

Easy access to the Internet and digital photography has resulted in an ever growing number of photographers uploading their images for comments and ratings from peers. Online communities evolve and these mini-societies each have their pecking order, internal groups and communal preferences. Photographers learn from each other. On sites that have a rating system there is often pressure to conform to certain styles, techniques and even subject matter. Although I participate in numerous sites (it's great fun), I recognise the danger of becoming a herd animal and losing the edge of individual creativity. There will always be the creatives that lead the way and the imitators that can only try to follow in their footsteps. This lead me to think about classifying photographers according their inner motivation. So as a bit of fun here are a few different types: The innovator Driven to always find something new, different and creative. Wants to be leading edge. Motivated by creative satisfa