What tags would apply to you as a photographer? It's a fascinating question. In a sense the tags are your photographic DNA, or in marketing speak your brand.
People who know how diverse my work is may wonder what tags would apply to me as a photographer. I wonder too. Different editors and art directors will no doubt have their individual set of tags depending on what they use my work for and how they perceive it. I don't think that I can be easily pigeon holed. But maybe I'm missing something.
There's a very interesting article on one of my favourite blogs which you should read if you're interested in how photographers are perceived by photo editors.
I've had a go at picking my own tags:
Many thanks,
Paul
People who know how diverse my work is may wonder what tags would apply to me as a photographer. I wonder too. Different editors and art directors will no doubt have their individual set of tags depending on what they use my work for and how they perceive it. I don't think that I can be easily pigeon holed. But maybe I'm missing something.
There's a very interesting article on one of my favourite blogs which you should read if you're interested in how photographers are perceived by photo editors.
I've had a go at picking my own tags:
- color
- black & white
- digital
- available light
- location
- portrait
- photojournalist
- fine art
- captured moment
- quirky
- real people
Many thanks,
Paul
Comments
"real people".
kurt