Skip to main content

Take me too - the intention of the photographer

Why do we take pictures? Let me explain where I'm coming from on this. I've seen a lot of knit picking comments on photo-upload sites and from photographic judges, and conversely I've seen a huge amount of praise heaped on images which are quite frankly apalling. I'm sure that if you've visited sites where you can upload pictures or been to 'certain' competitions you will know what I mean.

So clearly there are a whole range of motives that play a role when people comment on an image. But objectively, if such a thing is possible, what really counts when you look at an image. Well I go back to the question I started with. Why do you take pictures? The intention of the photographer is integral to understanding and evaluating an image. Often, under the guise of being artistic, a pure a photograher will not say why they took an image... Well that leaves it open to all interpretations. Were they recording something for prosperity, perhaps a family moment, were they trying to master studio lighting etc. We can only really judge an image in the light of the image makers intention. Purpose and meaning are central, however fluffy that may be, say for example to evoke a certain emotion by using a strong colour.

By knowing your intention when you take the photograph and then conveying that to the audience you will help them appreciate the image. From photojournalists writing a cutline (caption) to an artist's statement in a gallery catalogue, words and concepts affect the way we perceive an image, and more than that they add value.

I hope that I make images which touch the viewer and evoke a strong emotion, particularly empathy with the subject. Although I do shoot abstracts and landscapes, I am at heart a photojournalist, seeking to tell a story in a creative way that communicates emotion and engages the viewer.

The image below is an example. It shows a Border Collie looking longingly over the backseat of a car at a young couple in love and involved with each other, walking away toward the sea, on a cliff. The dog caught in the rear view mirror forms a strong focal point in an original and creative composition. The whole story is there.

In fact I had just parked. The dog was my border collie (sadly he passed away - this was his last trip to the sea) and a couple that happened to walk past the car. I saw the potential in an instant. Raised my camera, focused and got the shot. I created a narrative in that moment by juxtaposing two elements. Not photojournalism in the true sense but a moment of artistic creation to tell a story. To me the dog really looks like he is saying "take me too"!

So why to do you photograph?

Paul Indigo

Comments

GarageOlympo said…
A beautiful composition and excellent reflex. Congratulations.

Popular posts from this blog

Overcoming creative block and self doubt

Every photographer, for that matter every creative, I've ever met comes to a point when they're not happy with the work they're producing. The pendulum between creative highs and dry spells swings continuously. For some the cycle is long and the bouts are quite mild for others the feeling of doubt about their work can be a crushing experience which returns all to frequently. It's actually quite healthy to have these periods of doubt because it can often be the beginning of something new and interesting which takes you further than you thought possible. Creatives in the commercial world have to always perform and although they may agree looking back that they've had a few patches where their work was less good, they always seem to bounce back. A very few creative geniuses deliver such high quality work that their poorest attempts still surpass the rest of us. But I have never heard of anyone, from tortured soul of Van Gogh to the supreme showman and genius, Salvador ...

What You Photograph Reveals How You Think

  Photography is often described as a way of seeing. Less often do we talk about it as a way of thinking. What you choose to photograph, and just as importantly what you ignore, quietly mirrors how your mind works. Some photographers are drawn to faces, micro-expressions, emotional spikes. Others chase atmosphere, light, mood. Then there are those who gravitate towards structure, systems, order, the invisible logic holding a scene together. None of this is accidental. The camera becomes a sorting tool. It reveals what your brain prioritises. Where others see chaos, you might see alignment. Where some look for drama, you look for balance. Geometry, repetition, flow, layers, these aren’t just visual preferences, they’re cognitive ones. Strong graphic images tend to come from people who think spatially. Who notice how things relate before they notice what they mean. Lines before labels. Structure before story. And yet, the best images rarely stop there. They gain depth when human pres...

Is professional photography still a viable career?

I am not against amateurs and semi-professionals selling their photography. It's a great way to earn some extra cash. However I am concerned about the level of high quality published work and the standards that clients and the public accept these days. It seems that just about everyone is a photographer. The line between amateur enthusiast and professional is fuzzy to say the least. Photography enthusiasts are selling their images through stock libraries and microstock websites, directly to magazines or through their own and third party sites. They're accepting commissions to shoot weddings, being hired to shoot for magazines and selling fine art prints from their websites. They're teaching photography on the weekend and guiding photographic holidays and safaris. Photography became accessible to the masses with the first non-expert cameras and the famous Kodak slogan"You press the button, we do the rest." The digital camera age has taken the whole thing to a ne...