Skip to main content

Take me too - the intention of the photographer

Why do we take pictures? Let me explain where I'm coming from on this. I've seen a lot of knit picking comments on photo-upload sites and from photographic judges, and conversely I've seen a huge amount of praise heaped on images which are quite frankly apalling. I'm sure that if you've visited sites where you can upload pictures or been to 'certain' competitions you will know what I mean.

So clearly there are a whole range of motives that play a role when people comment on an image. But objectively, if such a thing is possible, what really counts when you look at an image. Well I go back to the question I started with. Why do you take pictures? The intention of the photographer is integral to understanding and evaluating an image. Often, under the guise of being artistic, a pure a photograher will not say why they took an image... Well that leaves it open to all interpretations. Were they recording something for prosperity, perhaps a family moment, were they trying to master studio lighting etc. We can only really judge an image in the light of the image makers intention. Purpose and meaning are central, however fluffy that may be, say for example to evoke a certain emotion by using a strong colour.

By knowing your intention when you take the photograph and then conveying that to the audience you will help them appreciate the image. From photojournalists writing a cutline (caption) to an artist's statement in a gallery catalogue, words and concepts affect the way we perceive an image, and more than that they add value.

I hope that I make images which touch the viewer and evoke a strong emotion, particularly empathy with the subject. Although I do shoot abstracts and landscapes, I am at heart a photojournalist, seeking to tell a story in a creative way that communicates emotion and engages the viewer.

The image below is an example. It shows a Border Collie looking longingly over the backseat of a car at a young couple in love and involved with each other, walking away toward the sea, on a cliff. The dog caught in the rear view mirror forms a strong focal point in an original and creative composition. The whole story is there.

In fact I had just parked. The dog was my border collie (sadly he passed away - this was his last trip to the sea) and a couple that happened to walk past the car. I saw the potential in an instant. Raised my camera, focused and got the shot. I created a narrative in that moment by juxtaposing two elements. Not photojournalism in the true sense but a moment of artistic creation to tell a story. To me the dog really looks like he is saying "take me too"!

So why to do you photograph?

Paul Indigo

Comments

GarageOlympo said…
A beautiful composition and excellent reflex. Congratulations.

Popular posts from this blog

Approach to taking a portrait

Portrait of Amitabh Bachchan. Click on the image to see larger version. Every portrait is different but there are also elements which are the same, whether you’re shooting the famous or the locally famous. Fame is of course all relative. It depends on profession, accomplishments or media celebrity status. Whoever the ‘famous’ individual is there are millions of people in the world who will never have heard them. For example I photographed the legendary Indian Bollywood actor Amitabh Bachchan, who amongst his many accolades was awarded the Legion d'Honneur, the highest civilian award of France. But I’m positive that many people in North America will not have heard of him – although he has more fans than Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson and Robert De Niro put together. I find that however well known a person is cracking through egos and insecurities is really important when it comes to getting authentic strong portraits. However I hasten to add that when it came to photographing Amitabh th

The portrait photographer's motivation

Easy access to the Internet and digital photography has resulted in an ever growing number of photographers uploading their images for comments and ratings from peers. Online communities evolve and these mini-societies each have their pecking order, internal groups and communal preferences. Photographers learn from each other. On sites that have a rating system there is often pressure to conform to certain styles, techniques and even subject matter. Although I participate in numerous sites (it's great fun), I recognise the danger of becoming a herd animal and losing the edge of individual creativity. There will always be the creatives that lead the way and the imitators that can only try to follow in their footsteps. This lead me to think about classifying photographers according their inner motivation. So as a bit of fun here are a few different types: The innovator Driven to always find something new, different and creative. Wants to be leading edge. Motivated by creative satisfa

Is professional photography still a viable career?

I am not against amateurs and semi-professionals selling their photography. It's a great way to earn some extra cash. However I am concerned about the level of high quality published work and the standards that clients and the public accept these days. It seems that just about everyone is a photographer. The line between amateur enthusiast and professional is fuzzy to say the least. Photography enthusiasts are selling their images through stock libraries and microstock websites, directly to magazines or through their own and third party sites. They're accepting commissions to shoot weddings, being hired to shoot for magazines and selling fine art prints from their websites. They're teaching photography on the weekend and guiding photographic holidays and safaris. Photography became accessible to the masses with the first non-expert cameras and the famous Kodak slogan"You press the button, we do the rest." The digital camera age has taken the whole thing to a ne